Question
You might want to double and then triple check it. Some of the info is just sooooooo wrong it should glare right up at you
Anyone see anything wrong with the title on a LOT these auctions(the title is eBay's)?
http://search.ebay.com/MVC-FD73_W0QQ...titleZMVC-FD73
ETA-oh, and look at the pre-filled in info
Answer
???
What is the blatent error?
(quick running through the checklist)
It's a less than .5 megapixel camera
10x zoom
floppy disk needed
perhaps the term "razor sharp pictures" is not quite right, but you gotta sell it somehow in this day and age of cameras w/ much greater resolution.
I'm a camera whore and I'm missing it *Pout*
Answer
Does anyone else see the title and specs. in huge letters?
Answer
Can't see it here.
Answer
0.35 Megapixels?
Answer
No, the .35 megapixels is correct.
Answer
Have been away from the computer for awhile.
I was told at some point awhile back that the fd73 was better than the camera I have, which is a Cybershot 1.3 mp
Looking at one description it said 3.5 mp-and that sounds much better compared to my 1.3. But 0.35 doesn't sound better-so why should it be better?
You know, I think you are right. So it really is 0.35mp? Why would anyone buy something that low? If the mp are lower than what I've got now, and that's not good for taking people type pics, but not bad for closer shots then why should it be better? Is there something I'm missing? Other than a good optical zoom that is.
Sorry I had posted and disappeared.
Originally Posted by rosiebud
No, the .35 megapixels is correct.
Answer
Did you mean like "Back to Keyword Fenton"? I think that was the last search I had done!